Wednesday 30 October 2013

Wall-Climbing Concrete-Evaluation Robot Successfully Tested

A new robot for inspection of concrete successfully climbed the dam’s walls, testing the dam’s structural reliability.
Numerous of the America’s 104 nuclear plants are crossing the mid age of their deigned serviceable life, while, according to ASCE, several dams have almost at the verge of end of their design life. Testing of these precious structures is necessary to maintain the safety. The robot, named “crawler bot”, will cost few dollars by automating the testing process.

Few Words from Project Manager

The senior project managerElectric Power Research Institute (EPRI), Maria Guimaraes says “We were previously testing this is laboratories only. Now the real-word results are awesome,” about the test of robot conducted near Niagara on Robert Moses Hydroelectric Dam. When a structure needs inspection, we usually use rappels workers or scaffolding down the utility, says Guimaraes.  The robot could minimize or completely eliminate the need to send the worker up and down the structures. “The full combined system is a whole new thing for me,” she says.
Crawler Bot or Concrete Testing
Crawler Bot or Concrete Testing
Crawler bot is a modified version of a marketable available robot by ICM (International Climbing Machines), an Ithaca manufacturer. A 110-volt vacuum is installed in robot, which creates a vacuum suction chamber between its tracks, helping the bot to be stick to the wall. The friction between the foam tracks is very low hence allowing the robot to uphold the suction that is so strong that it can carry weight up to 40 lbs. and even cross over bolts, nuts or cracked concrete. “When I tried to remove it from the wall, I simple was unable to do it,” says Guimaraes. Another step to achieve was to install the sensors on robot to test the concrete.
Investigators from numerous universities and research assemblies, including the ERPI, equipped the robot with numerous non-destructive evaluation (NDE) systems to judge thestructural integrity of the structure. Acoustic sensor was used to check the delamination at the Niagara test by Guimaraes and her mates. An “air coupling” mechanism was used by sensor, meaning that the structure will not be touched by the sensor to check the delamination, according to Guimaraes. New York Power Authority partially funded the test and help them to get access the dam and its secret historical data, without which it was not possible to perform the test. NYPA will consider the areas indicated by the robot, when the will repair the dam in 2014.

Future Plans:

For future, the researcher plans to install the sensors on robot to check the level of the moisture in concrete wall and the integrity of reinforcement. The robot is equipped with a microwave antenna to tests the concrete’s reinforcement. “The plan is that we can change the robot’s sensor type and let it keep running,” says Guimaraes. After choosing the correct sensors, the robot will follow a predetermined path and records the regions where it finds problems in the utility.
The need of the test was just felt after the release of a report by Nuclear Energy Standards Coordination Collaborative (NESCC), stating the new recommendations for the improvement of repairing work for nuclear plant concrete and showing the gaps and conflicts with the existing and old standards and codes. The NESCC also stats that there is no implemented code currently for the repair of nuclear plants. It decides to change it soon which will increase the popularity and demand for Guimaraes robot.
Guimaraes and the team hope to have a commercial version of the robot by 2016, but she says there are still many tests that must take place before that can happen.

Saturday 19 October 2013

The Water Cycle Controlled by Sun


NASA: Asteroid coming close in 2032 no concern


This is an artist impression obtained from The University of Warwick and The University of Cambridge shows a rocky and water-rich asteroid being torn apart by the strong gravity of the white dwarf star GD 61. AFP PHOTO / Image copyright Mark A. Garlick, space-art.co.uk, The University of Warwick and The University of Cambridge


WASHINGTON: NASA says a big asteroid that whizzed by Earth last month unnoticed is probably nothing to worry about when it returns much closer in 19 years.
NASA Near-Earth Object program manager Donald Yeomans said there is a 1 in 48,000 chance that the 1,300-foot (400-meter) asteroid will hit Earth when it returns on Aug. 26, 2032.
The asteroid called 2013 TV135 was discovered Oct. 8, nearly a month after it came within 4.2 million miles (6.7 million kilometers) of Earth. Yeomans said as astronomers observe and track it better, they will likely calculate that it has no chance of hitting Earth.
Although big, the asteroid is considerably smaller than the type that caused the dinosaur extinction.
NASA posted a "reality check" about the asteroid in response to some media reports.

Friday 4 October 2013

Fuel Exhaust Disrupts Scent Signals for Honeybees

Tuesday 1 October 2013

Building Design Cosiderations

Building Design

  • Environmental requirements
  • Structural requirements
  • Aesthetic requirements
  • Cost constraints
  • Dimensional constraints
  • Statutory requirements
  • Life of the building
  • Manufacturing and erection considerations

WALLS

Walls are the vertical elements of a building which enclose the space within it and which may also divide that space


Functional Requirements

  • strength and stability
  • weather resistance
  • fire resistance
  • thermal insulation
  • sound insulation

Form of Construction

  • Masonry (e.g. brickwalls)
  • Monolithic (e.g. concrete walls)
  • Frame (e.g. timber stud)
  • Membrane (e.g. sandwich)

Strength

Resistance to:
  • stresses set up by its own weight
  • superimposed loads
  • lateral pressure (e.g. wind)

Stability

Resistance to:
  • overturning by lateral force
  • buckling caused by excessive slenderness

PERFORMANCE

Weather Resistance

Provide adequate resistance to rain and wind penetration:
  • adequate thickness [for external walls, minimum 150mm - concrete; 225mm - brickwork]
  • adequate damp proofing means at critical position

Fire Resistance

Walls can act as Fire Barriers to compartmentalise a building so that a fire is confined to a given area.
They can separate specific fire risks within a building to form safe escape routes.

Thermal Insulation

Act as barriers:
  • to prevent heat loss to the environment (in "cool" areas)
  • to prevent heat gain (in "hot" areas)

Sound Insulation

Requirements to prevent airborne sound and impact sound:
  • external walls
  • internal walls (prevention of passage of sound from one space to another)

MATERIALS

Types of Bricks & Blocks

  • Clay bricks
  • Calcium silicate bricks
  • Concrete bricks
  • Clay blocks
  • Dense concrete blocks
  • Aerated (lightweight) concrete blocks

Types of Mortars

  • cement sand mortar
  • cement lime sand
  • cement sand with plasticiser
  • lime and sand

Brickwall Strength


Slenderness Ratio

The slenderness ratio of a wall and the eccentricity of the load will indicate whether the wall will crush or buckle. The greater the slenderness and eccentricity, the sooner buckling will occur.
Slenderness Ratio = (Effective length or height) / Effective width
effective width - least lateral dimension

Effective Length

The effective length or height of a wall depends on how the wall is held at its ends or points of lateral support.

Major Elements in a Building



Relationship Between Foundation and Loading



A Framed Building